Was World War One Responsible for Nicholas Ii’s Downfall?

Emily Hawkins How far do you retard that Nicholas IIs d produce infall was caused by World War 1? 1914 was a devastating year for some(prenominal) a(prenominal) countries of the human beings, as conception articulate of struggle one began to bow full effect. But as piece contend one shook the world it began to question Nicholas IIs faculty to dominion Russia. In this essay i pull up stakes discuss the terminus of world contend ones debt instrument in Nicholas IIs d averfall, and the extent of other contributing incidentors. I will argue that Nicholas IIs avow traits as a leader were the of import(prenominal) causal agent for his downfall.On the one hand, world struggle one had a abundant cushion on the tzar and his coun fork bulge out. Firstly, the woo of the war was placing a huge strain on Russias economy. Taxes increase hugely and the cost of alive rose by cardinal hundred%, so in order to try and help the economy through and through the assay times of world war one, the administration printed to a greater extent specie, reservation all money worthless. The population of Russia were now struggling crimson more than they were before the war had begun. Secondly, the Germans were forcing the Russians to bed and they were on that pointfore losing a lot of land.The impaction of the battle of Tannenburg, where 30,000 troops were killed and 95,000 captured had a huge impact on the ground forcess moral, and by the end of 1916, 2 one thousand trillion soldiers had left the forces. The commander in chief shot himself because of how bad the country and the soldiery were doing, and soon afterwards, the tzar himself took on the business office of commander in chief, although he lacked expertness and knowledge. Also, the military had a lack of resources, in each regiment in the array in that respect was one gun per three wad the Tsar was blamed for many of the military downfalls, and this was one of them.The Russian enjo y system was also facing expert problems, and the ammunitions being made in the factories werent getting to the front line. Thirdly, world war one was cause huge intellectual nourishment shortages in Moscow in 1914, Russia was receiving 2200 wagons of particle and by Christmas 1916, the number of carts was down to respectable 300. This was because of distribution problems secret code could sort the carts out properly. They were prioritized to the front line, so that the soldiers got the first carts.But after the front line had been sent their grain, there was nobody sorting out the recumb of it there were carts found with bread disintegration away, bread that the starving Russian quite a little were missing out on. Although world war one was not the sole reason for Nicholas downfall, it did act as a catalyst. It increased the severity of the existing problems that Russia was facing. It also highlighted that the Tsar and the Romanov dynasty was no longsighteder capable of public opinion the country and that they didnt have the sustainment and determination to rule the country through a world war.On the other hand, there were many other reasons that the Tsars downfall occurred. Firstly, the strikes and demonstrations in Moscow and Petrograd were causing huge disruption, and when the Tsar tried to homecoming to Petrograd, his train was halt and he accomplished that he couldnt control the protestors a major sign that he had no control of Russia and its the great unwashed. Secondly, the revolutionary parties were spreading their primary ideas around the country, and also highlighting the weaknesses of the Romanov dynasty.The Tsars downfall was prone because of the heart of opposition that he faced and his outrage of support to the other governmental parties. Parties such(prenominal) as the Bolsheviks, Social Revolutionaries, Mensheviks and Populists educated the peasants and wage-earning stack on the need for a new type of leaders this encour age strikes and discontent. Many of the strikes were purely because of the appalling living and working conditions, and for a while, the people joined together because of the war, but when the Russian people began to feel the true cost of the war, the protests began to re-occur and more support for the Tsar was disordered.Thirdly, because of the troops refusing to bill at protestors on 25th of February, the ground forces snarl no longer have to be loyal to the Tsar. As long as the Tsar was not support by the legions, he had no regain of successfully chokening Russia. The Duma also refused orders to dissolve, and 12 of its members formed a committee that aforethought(ip) to take over Russia the called themselves The Provisional government activity. The soviets also issued Order number 1 which demanded that all officers in the army be elected by their men, proving that the Tsar had lost all of his causality.Therefore, there were many factors involve in the Tsars downfall, such as the political opposition, strikes and the disloyalty of the army and the Duma. at a time people started to support the other political parties, they lost all loyalty for the matinee idol appointed Tsar. The strikes highlighted the weaknesses of the Tsars leadership skills and proved that he couldnt no longer control and rule Russia. The disloyalty of the army and the Duma completely removed all of his power, moment that Nicholas could no longer be Tsar.I personally believe that Nicholas II was responsible for his own downfall. Although there was definitely contributing factors, his unprejudiced attitude and inability to effectively rule a country caused his downfall. Nicholas failed to trust blusher advisors such as Witte and Stolypin and despite him topic the October Manifesto he preserved his own autocratic power through the innate laws, which the Russian people didnt like. He failed to think and plan ahead to pee-pee a better future for Russia, he didnt think lik e a leader should.Even though the war was already a huge strain on Russia, and on Nicholas, he still felt it necessary to take over the mathematical function of commander in chief of the army although he had no experience or knowledge of the role. He was blamed for many of the armys failure, and people stopped believing in him. By Christmas 1916, the Russian army were struggling and with Nicholas II as an unqualified leader, poor communications and shortages of fare and supplies led to problems and Nicholas was blamed for the 1. million soldiers who died, the 3. 9 million wounded and the 2. 4 million who were now prisoners. As Nicholas was busy stressful to incapably run the army, he left his wife in charge of Russia, his wife that nobody care. As she was German born, the Russian people thought that she was sympathetic to the enemy, and they deeply mistrusted her. The Russian people looked at their leadership and dictum the ineffectiveness they began to look for alternative lea ders.Also, people disliked the Tsar, as he took light upon advice from Rasputin, who was disliked by the population for making many ministerial changes, and they thought that he was having an affair with the Tsarina. Some radical parties began to plot the death of Rasputin as the Russian people looked for alternatives to the Romanov dynasty. Therefore Nicholas was responsible for his own downfall. race began to dislike him after he failed to take care to his key advisors and improve Russia. This was made worsened by his inability to share power with the Dumas or any other political opposition.Russian people also hated the fact that Nicholas had taken the role of commander in chief of the army. He was unable to run the country, let alone the army as well. He had almost run Russia into the ground, and hence he left it in the hand of someone that none of the population liked or trusted, so that he could take up a role he knew nothing about which he failed at miserably, letting th e country and the army down. Therefore, i believe that Nicholas was responsible for his own downfall.There were many other things to blame though, such as world war one, the disloyalty of the army, and his political opposition. As soon as world war one started, the Russian people began to chitchat that Nicholas was incapable of running Russia and they looked towards the opposition for a way out of the autocratic state they had suffered so long. Once the loyalty of the army was lost, Nicholas had no chance of getting Russia lynchpin to how it was 100s of years before. He knew that his time of autocracy, and the time of the Romanov dynasty was up.